# When is percona-toolkit coming to RHEL10?

**URL:** <https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422>\
**Category:** Percona Toolkit\
**Tags:** new-release\
**Created:** [September 19, 2025, 4:22pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422 "2025-09-19T16:22:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Seth\_Lohr](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/seth_lohr/32/22142_2.png) [@Seth\_Lohr](https://forums.percona.com/u/Seth_Lohr)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2025, 4:22pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422/1 "2025-09-19T16:22:47Z")

</div>

For my own records, this is related to SOC-5151

It’s not listed as an option here: [https://www.percona.com/percona-toolkit](https://www.percona.com/percona-toolkit)

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/percona1/original/3X/4/4/440b554783d066f0bf0abc14c1b4fb16362c52e9.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vadim\_Yalovets](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/vadim_yalovets/32/43_2.png) [@Vadim\_Yalovets](https://forums.percona.com/u/Vadim_Yalovets)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2025, 6:35am UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422/2 "2025-09-20T06:35:28Z")

</div>

Hi Seth,

The package is available in [pdps-84-lts repo](https://repo.percona.com/pdps-84-lts/yum/release/10/RPMS/)

 ![Screenshot 2025-09-20 at 09.34.32](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/percona1/original/3X/2/7/278f0b8e252cf10b78f678b263650a9cac44c764.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Seth\_Lohr](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/seth_lohr/32/22142_2.png) [@Seth\_Lohr](https://forums.percona.com/u/Seth_Lohr)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2025, 4:28pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422/3 "2025-09-22T16:28:17Z")

</div>

Thanks. I’m not sure why it’s there and not listed on the main front page I linked - but I’ll grab it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Seth\_Lohr](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/seth_lohr/32/22142_2.png) [@Seth\_Lohr](https://forums.percona.com/u/Seth_Lohr)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2025, 2:50pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422/4 "2025-09-26T14:50:25Z")

</div>

Vadim,

That worked - but I’d expect it to be installing a repo. Is it intentional that it’s not?

```auto
_[/root/seth.lohr]_(root@foo)_
# rpm -ql percona-toolkit | grep -i yum

```

This is the reason I brought it up not being available on [https://www.percona.com/percona-toolkit](https://www.percona.com/percona-toolkit)

Those versions had yum repos that managed updates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vadim\_Yalovets](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/vadim_yalovets/32/43_2.png) [@Vadim\_Yalovets](https://forums.percona.com/u/Vadim_Yalovets)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2025, 4:03pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422/5 "2025-09-28T16:03:56Z")

</div>

Hi Seth,

Packages have been uploaded on the site.

 ![Screenshot 2025-09-28 at 19.03.05](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/percona1/original/3X/f/7/f7ca9d70d03da19093acffc7a5782fb54e46ee97.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Seth\_Lohr](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/seth_lohr/32/22142_2.png) [@Seth\_Lohr](https://forums.percona.com/u/Seth_Lohr)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2025, 1:59pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422/6 "2025-09-29T13:59:14Z")

</div>

Thanks Vadim, though it still doesn’t contain a repo like older versions

This is RHEL9

```auto
_[/root/seth.lohr]_(root@rhel9-foo)_
# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/percona-tools-release.repo
#
# This repo is managed by "percona-release" utility, do not edit!
#
[tools-release-x86_64]
name = Percona Tools release/x86_64 YUM repository
baseurl = http://repo.percona.com/tools/yum/release/$releasever/RPMS/x86_64
enabled = 1
gpgcheck = 1
gpgkey = file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/PERCONA-PACKAGING-KEY

[tools-release-sources]
name = Percona Tools release/sources YUM repository
baseurl = http://repo.percona.com/tools/yum/release/$releasever/SRPMS
enabled = 0
gpgcheck = 1
gpgkey = file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/PERCONA-PACKAGING-KEY

```

Which points to a working RPM repo: [Percona Repo](http://repo.percona.com/tools/yum/release/9/RPMS/x86_64/)

I suppose I could slap this into RHEL10, but want to make sure it’s a future proof way to do it:  
(note the two –\> changes)

```auto
#
# This repo is managed by "percona-release" utility, do not edit!
#
[tools-release-x86_64]
name = Percona Tools release/x86_64 YUM repository
baseurl = http://repo.percona.com/tools/yum/release/$releasever/RPMS/x86_64
--> https://repo.percona.com/pdps-84-lts/yum/release/$releasever/RPMS/x86_64/
enabled = 1
gpgcheck = 1
gpgkey = file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/PERCONA-PACKAGING-KEY

[tools-release-sources]
name = Percona Tools release/sources YUM repository
baseurl = http://repo.percona.com/tools/yum/release/$releasever/SRPMS
--> https://repo.percona.com/pdps-84-lts/yum/release/$releasever/SRPMS/
enabled = 0
gpgcheck = 1
gpgkey = file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/PERCONA-PACKAGING-KEY

```

It’s just pointing at the “pdps-84-lts” repo instead of “tools” - though I’m not sure why the shift here to “pdps-84-lts“ is needed. Is there an announcement somewhere about what that means and why it’s now in a differently named directory?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vadim\_Yalovets](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/vadim_yalovets/32/43_2.png) [@Vadim\_Yalovets](https://forums.percona.com/u/Vadim_Yalovets)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2025, 4:53pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/when-is-percona-toolkit-coming-to-rhel10/39422/7 "2025-10-01T16:53:11Z")

</div>

> [@Seth\_Lohr](#):
>
> It’s just pointing at the “pdps-84-lts” repo instead of “tools” - though I’m not sure why the shift here to “pdps-84-lts“ is needed. Is there an announcement somewhere about what that means and why it’s now in a differently named directory?

Since the Tools repository is scheduled for deprecation in the near future, packages will no longer receive updates there.
