# pt-table-checksum alternatives

**URL:** <https://forums.percona.com/t/pt-table-checksum-alternatives/6647>\
**Category:** Percona Toolkit\
**Created:** [October 23, 2018, 3:51am UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/pt-table-checksum-alternatives/6647 "2018-10-23T03:51:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hoangnganvy1993](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/eb9ed0/32.png) [@hoangnganvy1993](https://forums.percona.com/u/hoangnganvy1993)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2018, 3:51am UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/pt-table-checksum-alternatives/6647/1 "2018-10-23T03:51:53Z")

</div>

Hey all.  
We are in need of tool, which will be checking replication data for consistency. This tool would be great, but its limitation is ROW/MIXED based replication doesn’t work…  
Do you guys have any idea of possible alternatives?  
Many thanks in advance!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![przemek](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/przemek/32/3_2.png) [@przemek](https://forums.percona.com/u/przemek)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2018, 8:13am UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/pt-table-checksum-alternatives/6647/2 "2018-10-24T08:13:10Z")

</div>

Hi,

What is your exact replication topology now? Please note that ROW format is only a problem for chained replication. The tool will use statement per it’s session for master and one level slave just fine.
