# percona xtrabackup 2.2.4 innobackup update

**URL:** <https://forums.percona.com/t/percona-xtrabackup-2-2-4-innobackup-update/3834>\
**Category:** Percona XtraBackup\
**Created:** [October 19, 2014, 8:32pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/percona-xtrabackup-2-2-4-innobackup-update/3834 "2014-10-19T20:32:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![giantmangu888](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/4491bb/32.png) [@giantmangu888](https://forums.percona.com/u/giantmangu888)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2014, 8:32pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/percona-xtrabackup-2-2-4-innobackup-update/3834/1 "2014-10-19T20:32:35Z")

</div>

when I backup mysql5.6.19 on slave with percona-xtrabackup 2.2.4，I find that innobackupex executes the command：  
FLUSH ENGINE LOGS  
this command will be record to slave binlog，which leads to inconsistency between master and slave

NOw,I have update the innobackupex file ,as follows:  
replace the line :  
mysql\_query(%mysql, “FLUSH ENGINE LOGS”);  
with  
mysql\_query(%mysql, “FLUSH ENGINE LOGS”);

I have test it,and now do not record “FLUSH ENGINE LOGS” to slave binlog

that 'all,thank you

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![niljoshi](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forums.percona.com/niljoshi/32/16889_2.png) [@niljoshi](https://forums.percona.com/u/niljoshi)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2014, 11:34pm UTC](https://forums.percona.com/t/percona-xtrabackup-2-2-4-innobackup-update/3834/2 "2014-11-02T23:34:49Z")

</div>

Hi,

Thanks for providing this information. Is it possible for you to report bug with all required details? It will be helpful.  
[url][https://bugs.launchpad.net/percona-xtrabackup/+filebug[/url]](https://bugs.launchpad.net/percona-xtrabackup/+filebug%5B/url%5D)